Editorial standards

Buronia publishes benefit pages for a high-stakes subject: public support that affects rent, food, children, work, health, and household income. Our editorial standard is simple: the official authority is the source of truth, and Buronia must make that source easier to understand, not replace it.

Source hierarchy

Every benefit page is anchored to the official ministry, agency, or municipal source stored for that benefit in the registry. The public page links to that source so users can verify the program directly. If a conflict exists between Buronia copy and the official source, the official source wins and the Buronia page must be corrected.

Review process

Before a benefit page is added to the launch index, the editorial pass checks the program name, responsible authority, application channel, eligibility summary, required evidence, and any value or threshold claims against the official source. Pages with incomplete source coverage can remain available for product testing, but they should not be included in the index budget.

Benefit rates, income thresholds, deadlines, and named authority links are reviewed at least quarterly. They are also reviewed when a ministry, social-insurance agency, or national benefit portal publishes a change affecting a launched page. When ministry-source content changes, the page's registry-owned last_reviewed date is bumped so the visible byline, Article JSON-LD, and sitemap lastmod all move together.

Buronia drafting

Buronia helps draft application letters and structure user answers. Draft output is not treated as an authority. The page facts, benefit names, source URLs, and eligibility explanations must be traced back to official sources or intentionally removed. We do not invent review boards, external editors, success rates, or approval statistics.

Corrections

Corrections can be sent to corrections@buronia.com. Please include the page URL, the sentence or claim that appears wrong, and, if possible, the official source showing the correction. For urgent issues that could cause a user to miss a deadline, lose a benefit, or submit to the wrong authority, include "urgent correction" in the subject line.

Confirmed corrections are prioritized ahead of new content. If a page cannot be corrected quickly because the official source is ambiguous or unavailable, the page should be narrowed, marked more cautiously, or removed from the index budget until the source is clear.

Independence

Editorial content is not sold to advertisers and is not changed because a government authority, payment provider, or commercial partner prefers different wording. Funding and pricing are disclosed separately on the Funding page.